Ask Your Military Law Question. Military Law Experts Answer You ASAP.

(Not a Military Law Question?)

I am a former spouse of a retired military member. My
Sent to Military Law Experts May 05 07:06 PM

I am a former spouse of a retired military member. My ex-husband retired 4 years ago and was just awarded 10% disability from the VA. I was married for 24 years and am eligible for the 20/20/20 Uniformed Spouses Protection Act. My question is they just started taking 59.00 month out of my portion of 50% of retirement benefits. I was told that my ex- husband is responsible to reimbusrse me the 59.00 plus any increases that the VA takes out in the furture for his 10% disability payments. Is this accurate?   Is there a statute that I can refer to in order to take him to small claims court to receive a jusgement?

 

Optional Information:
Colorado Springs, Colorado

Already Tried:
nothing

Customer (name blocked for privacy)
Answer
May 6 5:49 AM (10 hours and 43 minutes and 44 seconds later)
         
ACCEPTEDCheck Mark
ANSWER:
The divorce court only has authority to divide “military retired pay.” The federal law does not allow for division of VA disability pay. If a retired service member qualifies for VA disability pay and opts to accept it, it will result in a dollar-for-dollar reduction of his military retired pay. And this will result in a corresponding pro-rata reduction in the amount to the military retired pay to which you are entitled to receive. (He, of course, still get the same total amount of money, and the dollars that are paid to him as VA disability pay are non-taxable, unlike the dollars that constitute military retired pay.)

It is a common tactic for retired service persons to seek to qualify for VA disability pay, since the dollars are tax-free and, in addition, it will reduce the amount paid to the former spouse as division of retired pay, with those dollars then going into the pocket of the retired service person in the from of disability pay.

Generally, a carefully prepared divorce decree, drafted by the wife's lawyer (and NOT the husband's attorney) so as to provide protection to her, will include an “indemnification” provision in the divorce decree that will protect the former spouse (wife) by requiring husband to indemnify (reimburse) wife for any payment reduction she incurs in the event he waives retired pay in order to receive disability pay.

Typical divorce decree language might read as follows:
----> "If the husband takes any action (such as accepting disability pay) that reduces the pay the wife receives, then he shall pay her directly the amount by which her share is reduced. In addition, husband hereby consents to the payment of this amount from any periodic payments he receives (such as wages) to allow this payment to wife, and this clause may be used to show said consent when this is necessary for the entry of a garnishment, wage assignment or income withholding order."

There is no law that requires your ex- husband to be responsible to reimburses you for the reduced share of retired pay that you are now receiving due to his having waived retired pay in order to receive VA disability benefits. HOWEVER, you need to carefully read your divorce decree to see if it contains an indemnification provision such as mentioned above. If it does, you would then have standing to enforce it.

BUT.... All hope is not to be lost! The courts of Colorado have confronted and recognized the injustice, unfairness and inequity resulting when ex-husbands such as yours do what your ex-husband and now done, and they don’t want to let them get away it.

You need to carefully study the following cases from Colorado Court of Appeals:

in re Marriage of Warkocz, 141 P3d 926 (Colo App 2006).
http://www.courts.state.co.us/coa/opinion/2006/2006q2/04CA2031.pdf
---> “Wife contends that the trial court erred in failing to award her the amount she would have received from husband's military pay had he not applied for, and received, disability benefits. She argues that she is entitled to relief based on the provisions of the agreement. We agree.”
---> “Consistent with the public policy of our state [Colorado] and the decisions of the other jurisdictions noted above, we conclude that the trial court is not precluded from equitably enforcing the parties' agreement. We agree with [the decisions of other state appellate courts] that "neither the USFSPA nor prior Supreme Court decisions require our courts to completely ignore the economic consequences of a military retiree's decision to waive retirement pay in order to collect disability pay."

In re Marriage of Lodeski, 107 P3d 1097 (Colo App 2004)
http://www.cobar.org/opinions/opinion.cfm?OpinionID=4886
---> "Husband contends that, because he has the right under federal law to elect to receive veterans’ disability benefits and waive military retirement pay, he cannot be held in contempt for converting his pension. We disagree.”

Sooooooo.... I want you to confer with a Colorado family law lawyer who is expereince with the USFSPA rules and regulations and how that law is dealt with by the Colorado courts. For starters, try the Find-a-Lawyer website for the Colorado Bar Association at:
http://www.cobar.org/directory/index.cfm?ID=20036

OK. I wish you all the best. (Sorry I’m not in Colorado. If I were, you could hire me and I would get job done.)

=========================
---> NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER (“The Fine Print”): The foregoing response is based only on the facts gleaned from your inquiry and does not constitute a definitive legal analysis or evaluation of the facts and circumstances of your particular case and the law applicable thereto. The information provided here should not be the sole basis for your decision(s) regarding the handling or resolution of the legal problem or issue presented. Limitations and restrictions of this forum prevent any claim or guarantee as to the completeness, accuracy or adequacy of the information contained herein and no such claim is made or guarantee given. The foregoing response to your inquiry is not intended to be and should not be accepted as a substitute for the professional legal advice and counsel that can only be given by a lawyer licensed to practice in the state that has jurisdictional authority over the case. I am licensed to practice law only in the state of Oregon. No attorney-client relationship is intended or created by or through the response(s) given here. (Sorry this is so long. But I’m a lawyer, so it should come as no surprise.)

I hope you find this answer acceptable. You need to click the ACCEPT button to so acknowledge. And PLEASE be sure to add a few kind words in the FEEDBACK section. That lets me know how I’m doing and is most appreciated. Thank You!



Lawrence D. Gorin, Oregon Lawyer
Reply
May 6 11:38 AM (5 hours and 48 minutes and 17 seconds later)
         
Thank you for your answer, and for directing me to further information and help. I truly appreciate it. :)
Think you can answer this question?
Login or Become an Expert

 

DISCLAIMER: You acknowledge that any information you may obtain from individuals you contact through use of the JustAnswer service comes from those individuals, not from JustAnswer, and that JustAnswer is not in any way responsible for any of the information these third parties may supply. The site and services are provided "as is" with no warranty and no representations are made regarding the qualification of an Expert. Responses and comments on JustAnswer are for general information and are not intended to substitute for informed professional advice (such as medical, legal, investment or accounting) and do not establish a professional-client relationship. JustAnswer is not intended or designed to address EMERGENCY QUESTIONS which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service.

JustAnswer > Military Law Advice